AI Governance & Assurance Lead

You will lead the hands-on human assurance workflow around Lawnise's verification platform: validating evidence, challenging weak or duplicated findings and preparing consequential cases for governed adjudication.

You are the bridge between machine-generated observations, professional review and the customer's operating decision. Your work must be useful to practitioners, defensible to another reviewer and honest about uncertainty across both public AI and the AI an enterprise deploys.

A verification platform does not remove the need for professional judgement. As Lawnise moves into enterprise engagements, customers need dependable review, clear evidence, responsive coordination and a traceable route from finding to action. This role makes that operating discipline real—and feeds what it learns back into the platform.

• Define engagement scope, success criteria, evidence requirements and decision boundaries with the customer.
• Review findings across public AI and Internal AI engagements, challenge weak evidence and identify false positives, false negatives, duplication and material uncertainty.
• Prepare, review and coordinate adjudication under the approved methodology and separation-of-duties requirements.
• Escalate regulatory or legal interpretation to the customer's responsible function and counsel; Lawnise does not replace their legal judgement.
• Produce clear evidence packs, executive readouts and service reviews that distinguish facts, interpretation, limitations and recommended action.
• Coordinate customer evidence requests, review meetings, clarifications, assigned actions and follow-up through handover or continuing verification.
• Maintain quality across working papers, decisions, corrections, Truth Packet preparation and customer communications.
• Improve review rubrics, evaluation corpora and methodology with engineering and research teams using observed cases.
• Escalate security-sensitive findings to the authorised security reviewer rather than extending an assurance judgement beyond your remit.

• Significant experience in compliance, operational risk, internal audit, regulatory reporting or assurance within—or advising—regulated financial institutions.
• Experience evaluating evidence, recording reasoned findings and defending conclusions under review.
• The ability to read regulatory and policy material closely while recognising the boundary between operational adjudication and legal interpretation.
• Experience presenting consequential work to risk, audit or senior leadership forums.
• Strong working-paper discipline and precise written communication.
• The judgement to challenge both automated output and confident human assumptions.

Experience with AI governance, model risk, responsible-AI frameworks or technology assurance is useful but not mandatory. Familiarity with vendor-delivered assurance or managed services will help. Bahasa Malaysia is useful for the launch market; Chinese-language capability may support some customer contexts.

We are open to a full-time or fractional arrangement, depending on experience, availability and the delivery model agreed together. You will have clear authority within the approved methodology and engagement scope.

You will not be asked to give legal opinions, certify conclusions beyond the evidence or collapse required separation of duties into one reviewer.

The final arrangement, responsibilities and decision authority will be confirmed in writing before the engagement begins.